You are here: 42 Resources Blog tags imaging

42 LLC

SANS

The Answer

Forensics, Security, Law

Tag >> imaging
Mar 05
2010

Manipulating encase E01 files, Myth or Reality?

Posted by Yogesh Khatri in Password CrackingimagingHackingForensicsEvidence VerificationE01 passwordacquisition

Yogesh Khatri
Recently, we had to process a case where we received many encase images (E01 files) which were password protected. The party that provided the images misplaced the password which meant Encase would not load them. We do a lot of our processing in Encase as it can be automated with scripting and it minimizes manual artifact extraction and reporting. Hence we needed to crack/remove the password from these files. 
 
The encase password protection feature is simply an application level protection. It does not protect the data within the E01 file. Utilities that operate with E01 files have the option of honoring or ignoring this “feature”. Hence FTK and tools using libewf load the file just fine, without asking for a password. We could re-image all the files in FTK to remove the passwords, so they can be used by encase, but that would require lots of time copying and verifying the files again, lots of extra disk space and many hours. So we decided to see if it’s possible to manipulate the E01 header to remove/blank out the password. 
 
The E01 format has been pretty well documented by Joachim Metz in his project libewf. What I found was pretty scary. The header fields in an E01 file are completely detached from the image data. There is absolutely nothing that protects that header, not even a checksum! It can be easily altered. The case information is stored in the header section which is a zlib (Deflate) compressed stream. This when decompressed is simply a tab-delimited text file, from which the password hash can easily be deleted and the resulting file recompressed and put back into the E01 file. The whole operating takes no more than a few minutes to perform manually once you figure out the offsets and text file format. Of course you will need a program that decompresses and recompresses a zlib stream. (That I had to create myself)
 
So practically anyone with this knowledge can now change acquisition information, i.e., notes, acquisition date and time, examiner name, case number, evidence type, drive serial number, drive type, etc...
The only catch is that the new compressed data stream (after manipulation) must be equal or smaller in size to fit in the space allotted for the header. If not, then all the data will have to be shifted down and the offsets and CRCs for the remaining sections in the files will have to be adjusted for all the evidence segments (E01, E02, E03...). This is a little more work, but is also easily accomplished.
 
We could easily then create a program to edit this information, but we leave that for another day. We did however create a utility to remove the password from an E01. You can download it here. It’s a command line application which takes only a few seconds to run, as only a few bytes in the first segment (E01) are modified. The other segments (E02, E03…) are not touched. It will create a backup of your original E01 file, just in case. 
 
It uses .NET 2.0, which you should already have unless you are running a really old XP system which never got any updates. If not, download and install it from Microsoft.
 
So in essence what we have proved today is that relying on an encase E01 file’s case information is really no better than the text file that accompanies DD images. There is no reason to believe it is un-alterable or secure by any means.
 
UPDATE: The file download error has now been fixed. If you cannot download files, let us know by posting a message on the forum. Thanks. 
Jun 18
2009

Forensic Imaging of RAM on live Linux systems

Posted by Chris Pavan in RAMlinuximagingForensicsacquisition

Chris Pavan

During CEIC this year I had a couple people come up to me and ask how to create an image of RAM on a Linux computer. Recently there have been a lot of tools created that gets the job done in Windows, but there is nothing really out there for Linux.

 I created a knowledgebase article that goes into detail on how to handle imaging RAM on a Linux system. I also cover how to use netcat to send the image across the network to a remote computer. The article can be found HERE.

 The basic command you are going to run is:

dd if=/dev/mem bs=4096 conv=noerror,sync | tee >evidence.dd | md5sum >evidence.hash

By using tee the data is written out to a file as well as passed down the pipeline so it can be hashed. Once your image completes, run md5sum against the output file and compare that to the hash originally created. If they match you are good to go.

If you want to send the data across the network get netcat listening on your target computer:

nc -l -p 5000 >evidence.dd

On the source computer use the following command:

dd if=/dev/mem bs=4096 conv=noerror,sync | tee >(nc -w 5 target_ipaddress 5000) | md5sum

Make sure you record the MD5 hash value when the process completes and then hash the output on the target computer and compare the two.

 There are also some issues with block sizes that you may run across that I cover in the knowledgebase article.

Incidentally, you can do the same thing with disks, just change the device (e.g. /dev/sda) and now you are taking an image of the serial attached hard drive sda. I am working on another KB article that will cover imaging hard drives on live systems with dd.

42 LLC | 2596 Mission St, Suite 203, San Marino, CA 91108 | info@42llc.net | +1 626.698.1189